| Sourced From |
I disagree with the logic and philosophy behind the Journal Editorials endorsement of the Stelmach governments plan to indemnify industry from liability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS). My intent is not to argue with an entity that buys ink by the barrel, but to promote a discussion on feasible alternatives to our current energy policy.
Look no further than the Journals own award-winning columnist, Graham Thomson, who writes
Related posts:
- Opinion: Why Reuters Acquisition of Point Carbon Is a Smart Move
- Research and Markets: The Latest Future of Carbon Capture and Storage Report Examines the Opportunities for Carbon Capture and Storage to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Opinion: Want to stop climate change? Move beyond carbon pricing
- Opinion: Another Benefit of Smart Grids, Fewer Utility Trucks Spewing CO2
- Opinion: Call for carbon trading, not tax