Full exposure to carbon scheme could jeopardise local paper industry

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email newsletter.

|Sourced From Manufacturers’ Monthly|

FULL exposure to a carbon cost scheme without appropriate transitional measures could jeopardise Australia’s pulp and paper industry, according to a new report released earlier this week.

A3P, the peak body representing the plantation products and paper industry, has commissioned an independent report to quantify and illustrate the status of the pulp and paper industry as an emissions-intensive trade-exposed industry as well as conducting a survey of the possible impact on facilities.

According to Richard Stanton, CEO of A3P, as paper is a renewable resource, it is recyclable, stores carbon and generates bioenergy, it should be able to make a positive contribution in a future carbon constrained world.

“We are concerned the implementation of Government policy could perversely lead to loss of investments in Australia for no carbon benefit and a poorer environmental outcome,” Stanton said.

It is feared that many facilities will either close down or become unprofitable if the carbon cost reaches $50 per tonne.

The pulp and paper industry contributes $2.7 billion to Australia’s GDP and directly employs around 19,000 people.

Under the Australian Government’s proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS), transitional measures will be put in place for industries that are deemed to be emissions-intensive trade-exposed (EITE) in order to smooth the transition to a low-carbon economy and prevent ‘carbon leakage’ to countries where there are no constraints on emissions.

Australia’s pulp and paper industry is one of the largest emissions-intensive trade-exposed non-metal manufacturing industries and faces potentially devastating consequences if a carbon cost is introduced without appropriate transitional measures.

According to the report, the key conclusions are as follows:

1. A carbon cost of $30 per tonne of CO2 equivalent would lead to the closure of 15% of Australia’s pulp & paper manufacturing facilities.

2. A carbon cost of $50 per tonne of CO2 equivalent would increase the level of closures to more than 30% of Australia’s pulp & paper facilities.

3. A carbon cost of $30 per tonne of CO2 equivalent wipes out the likely future investment that would have been expected in 25% of Australia’s pulp & paper facilities.

4. A carbon cost of $50 per tonne of CO2 equivalent means that less than 30% of Australia’s current pulp & paper facilities are profitable and could be expected to keep operating in the medium term.

Stanton called on the Government to review its proposed treatment of emissions-intense, trade-exposed to ensure that investment in the pulp and paper industry does not leak to other countries.

“Neither the Government, the public nor the industry should desire an outcome where Australia loses investment in sustainable industries.

“The Government must critically review the rules and limitations on permit allocation to emissions-intensive, trade-exposed industries,” he added.