In this column for National Journal I argue that (supposedly) binding quantity caps for GHG emissions are not the most productive way to co-operate on climate change. Converging on a gradually rising carbon price would get better results.
Continue Reading at
Related posts:
-
Getting the price of carbon into cap and trade
-
Russian Roulette: Russias surplus of carbon credits too big of a gamble for some
-
U.S. to propose CO2 cut target at Copenhagen talks
-
Opinion: Post-Copenhagen Carbon Trading Blues
-
Time for a price collar on carbon
Tags: Carbon Price, climate change, ghg