Carbon Offsets Daily

Daily carbon offset news, insight, community.

Carbon footprint notion fallacious


| Sourced From |

In April, a Bill entitled Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme was submitted to the Australian Senate.

A number of Australians are violently opposed to this Bill

Related posts:

  1. Australia: Emissions trading proposals under scrutiny
  2. Carbon scheme too high a price to pay: survey
  3. Controversial Carbon Target TV Ad Launched In Australia
  4. Carbon uncertainty
  5. Carbon trading scheme in 2010, says Penny Wong

Tags: , ,

One Response to “Carbon footprint notion fallacious”


  1. Paul Richardson
    on May 16th, 2009
    @ 1:57 am

    I disagree with the assumption that a substance cannot be both a pollutant, and a ‘natural and essential part of the worlds’ atmosphere’. In fact, it is both. Other substances, for example ozone, also fall into both categories. If you change ‘atmosphere’ to ‘environment’, you can also include copper, aluminium, silicon, etc, etc. Classification as a pollutant is not just to do with the identity of a substance, it is also related to its concentration, distribution, and a host of other factors.

Leave a Reply

© 2009 Carbon Offsets Daily. All Rights Reserved.

This blog is powered by .