• Home
  • GreenWorld
  • Asia
  • Australasia
  • Canada
  • Europe
  • Global
  • India
  • Top Stories
  • UK
  • USA
Currently with 2,113 posts and more than 10 new posts added each day!

Carbon Offsets Daily

The Best Resource On All Things Carbon

Planting Trees and Managing Soils to Sequester Carbon

Posted in Global on January 2, 2009

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our or .

| Sourced From |

“As of 2007, the shrinking forests in the tropical regions were releasing 2.2 billion tons of carbon per year,” says Lester R. Brown, President of the Earth Policy Institute, in a recent release, “Planting Trees and Managing Soils to Sequester Carbon.” “Meanwhile, expanding forests in the temperate regions were absorbing 0.7 billion tons of carbon annually. On balance, a net of some 1.5 billion tons of carbon were being released into the atmosphere each year, contributing to global warming.”

The tropical deforestation in Asia is driven primarily by the fast-growing demand for timber. In Latin America, it’s the growing demand for soybeans and beef that is deforesting the Amazon. In Africa, it is mostly the gathering of fuelwood and the clearing of new land for agriculture as existing cropland is degraded and abandoned. Today, because the earth’s forests are shrinking, they are a major source of CO2. The goal is to expand the earth’s tree cover, growing more trees to soak up CO2.

Environmental reasons have pushed Thailand, the Philippines, and China to implement complete or partial bans on logging. All three bans were imposed following devastating floods and mudslides resulting from the loss of forest cover. After nonstop flooding in the Yangtze River basin, Beijing noted that it simply did not make economic sense to continue deforesting. The flood control service of trees standing, they said, was three times as valuable as the timber from trees cut. With this in mind, Beijing took the step of paying loggers to become tree planters.

Other countries cutting down large areas of trees will also face the environmental effects of deforestation. If Brazil’s Amazon rainforest continues to shrink, it may also continue to dry out, becoming vulnerable to fire. If the rainforest disappears, it would be replaced largely by desert and scrub forestland. A burning Amazon would release billions of tons of carbon into the atmosphere, accelerating global warming.

Against this backdrop of growing concern about the forest-climate relationship, a leading Swedish energy firm, Vattenfall, has examined the large-scale potential for foresting wasteland to sequester carbon dioxide. They note that there are 1.86 billion hectares of degraded land in the world and that 930 million hectares of this have a chance of being profitably reclaimed. Some 840 million hectares of this total are in the tropical regions, where reclamation would mean much higher rates of carbon sequestration.

Vattenfall estimates that the maximum technical potential of these 930 million hectares is to absorb roughly 21.6 billion tons of CO2 per year. If, as part of a global climate stabilization strategy, carbon sequestration were valued at $210 per ton of carbon, the company believes that 18 percent of this technical potential could be realized. If so, this would mean planting 171 million hectares of land to trees. This area—larger than that planted to grain in India—would sequester 3.5 billion tons of CO2 per year. The total cost of sequestering carbon at $210 per ton would be $200 billion. Spread over a decade, this would mean investing $20 billion a year to give climate stabilization a large and potentially decisive boost.

A number of agricultural practices can also increase the carbon stored as organic matter in soils. Farming practices that reduce soil erosion and raise cropland productivity usually also lead to higher carbon content in the soil. Among these are shifting from conventional tillage to minimum-till and no-till, the more extensive use of cover crops, the return of all livestock and poultry manure to the land, expansion of irrigated area, a return to more mixed crop-livestock farming, and the forestation of marginal farmlands.

For full report visit http://www.earthpolicy.org/Books/Seg/PB3ch08_ss6.htm.

Contact Info: Media & Permissions to Reprint Contact:
Reah Janise Kauffman
Tel: (202) 496-9290 x 12
E-mail: rjk (at) earthpolicy.org

What’s Next?

  • Leave a comment

Related Posts

  • Carbon trading prices stabilise
  • Seed Our Future, an Organization That Enables Companies to Reduce Their Carbon Footprint by Planting Trees in Customers’ Names, Hires TransMedia to ‘Sow’ PR
  • Boatbookings.com Runs “Zero Carbon Footprint” Charter Promo
  • Mexico, Canada move on cap and trade
  • UAE: The future of cleantech?

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Recent Comments

    • on Carbon permits tip investors into generating power from rubbish
    • Don Pratt on Carbon Policy Meets Trade Policy
    • Adrian Batten on Bantar Gebang expected to earn carbon credits
    • Don Pratt on Bantar Gebang expected to earn carbon credits
    • on Alberta receives prestigious award for carbon capture and storage
  • Companies & CO2

    brands

    +

    carbon offsets

    who uses them?

  • Paid News Services





  • Exchanges

  • Interviews

    • All Interviews
  • News & Market Insight

  • Project Developer

  • Pages

    • About
      • Advertising
    • Brands and Carbon Offsets
    • Calculate Your Emissions
    • Carbon Emissions Management Software
    • Carbon Neutral Products
    • Carbon Offset Certifications
    • Carbon Offset Retailers
    • Events & Conferences
    • Glossary
    • GreenWorld
    • The Sustainable Blogosphere & Web
    • Tools For Business
    • What Is RSS?
    • _Customizations To This Blog
  • DAILY NEWS


     
    What is RSS?

    Or, subscribe via email:

    Or, follow on Twitter:

Get smart with the from DIY Themes.